Discussion:
[AUCTeX] TeX-next-error doesn't work
Janusz S. Bień
2018-02-23 08:34:39 UTC
Permalink
Hi!

When I try to use TeX-next-error, I get

TeX-parse-TeX: Symbol's function definition is void: signum

It's version 11.89.5 on
GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11) of 2017-09-12 on hullmann, modified by Debian

Best regards

Janusz
--
,
Prof. dr hab. Janusz S. Bien - Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra Lingwistyki Formalnej)
Prof. Janusz S. Bien - University of Warsaw (Formal Linguistics Department)
***@uw.edu.pl, ***@mimuw.edu.pl, http://fleksem.klf.uw.edu.pl/~jsbien/
David Kastrup
2018-02-23 08:52:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Janusz S. Bień
Hi!
When I try to use TeX-next-error, I get
TeX-parse-TeX: Symbol's function definition is void: signum
It's version 11.89.5 on
GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11) of
2017-09-12 on hullmann, modified by Debian
24.5? 25 came out in 2014.

That being said, our prerequisites in doc/install.texi do list Emacs 24
as requirement.
--
David Kastrup
Janusz S. Bień
2018-02-23 09:09:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Kastrup
Post by Janusz S. Bień
Hi!
When I try to use TeX-next-error, I get
TeX-parse-TeX: Symbol's function definition is void: signum
It's version 11.89.5 on
GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11) of
2017-09-12 on hullmann, modified by Debian
24.5? 25 came out in 2014.
I was not aware that the upgrade in Debian from 24 to 25 is not
automatic. Now I have

GNU Emacs 25.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11) of 2017-09-15, modified by Debian

The upgrade has not affected the AUCTex version, it is still 11.89.5. If
I remember well, I've installed it from ELPA.

The problem still occurs.
Post by David Kastrup
That being said, our prerequisites in doc/install.texi do list Emacs 24
as requirement.
So?

Best regards

Janusz
--
,
Prof. dr hab. Janusz S. Bien - Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra Lingwistyki Formalnej)
Prof. Janusz S. Bien - University of Warsaw (Formal Linguistics Department)
***@uw.edu.pl, ***@mimuw.edu.pl, http://fleksem.klf.uw.edu.pl/~jsbien/
David Kastrup
2018-02-23 09:32:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Janusz S. Bień
Post by David Kastrup
Post by Janusz S. Bień
Hi!
When I try to use TeX-next-error, I get
TeX-parse-TeX: Symbol's function definition is void: signum
It's version 11.89.5 on
GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11) of
2017-09-12 on hullmann, modified by Debian
24.5? 25 came out in 2014.
I was not aware that the upgrade in Debian from 24 to 25 is not
automatic. Now I have
GNU Emacs 25.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11) of
2017-09-15, modified by Debian
The upgrade has not affected the AUCTex version, it is still 11.89.5. If
I remember well, I've installed it from ELPA.
The problem still occurs.
Post by David Kastrup
That being said, our prerequisites in doc/install.texi do list Emacs 24
as requirement.
So?
Your complaint would have been valid even when using 24. I do think
that your problem has already been fixed in current AUCTeX versions: at
least I can find no active use of signum.
--
David Kastrup
Arash Esbati
2018-02-23 10:57:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Janusz S. Bień
When I try to use TeX-next-error, I get
TeX-parse-TeX: Symbol's function definition is void: signum
It's version 11.89.5 on
GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11) of 2017-09-12 on hullmann, modified by Debian
Hi Janusz,

this issue was fixed in AUCTeX with this patch[1]. Just update your
AUCTeX and try again.

Best, Arash

Footnotes:
[1] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/auctex.git/commit/tex-buf.el?id=9e627fc8d7b744dd5342cf3e0e76de67fa0eb9be
Janusz S. Bień
2018-02-23 11:03:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Arash Esbati
Post by Janusz S. Bień
When I try to use TeX-next-error, I get
TeX-parse-TeX: Symbol's function definition is void: signum
It's version 11.89.5 on
GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11) of 2017-09-12 on hullmann, modified by Debian
Hi Janusz,
this issue was fixed in AUCTeX with this patch[1]. Just update your
AUCTeX and try again.
Best, Arash
[1] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/auctex.git/commit/tex-buf.el?id=9e627fc8d7b744dd5342cf3e0e76de67fa0eb9be
[...]
Post by Janusz S. Bień
Your complaint would have been valid even when using 24. I do think
that your problem has already been fixed in current AUCTeX versions: at
least I can find no active use of signum.
Right, it works in the current version.
Thanks!
Janusz
--
,
Prof. dr hab. Janusz S. Bien - Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra Lingwistyki Formalnej)
Prof. Janusz S. Bien - University of Warsaw (Formal Linguistics Department)
***@uw.edu.pl, ***@mimuw.edu.pl, http://fleksem.klf.uw.edu.pl/~jsbien/
Loading...